Pictures of the faithful from the religion of peace (sarcasm on)

A Hindu being beaten by Muslims in a mosque in Bangladesh. He was captured outside the mosque while going home. After Friday prayers were over, the Muslims came out and grabbed the first Hindu they could. Mr. Vimal Patak a Bangladeshi born Hindu was beaten to death with sticks as the Muslim mullas (priests) chanted "kill the Kafir!" (non-muslim). With folded hands he begged for his life and died a brutal death. It clearly show the cruelty of Islam. "


From the book of peace, (sarcasm on) ,the koran, 1st picture on the left , A Palestinian crowd waves entrails of butchered Israeli victims in Ramala and on the right one of the "peaceful" faithful , proudly following the words of their faker profit......

5:33, The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; [Anyone who disbeliefs in Islam and speaks against it is considered to be waging war against Allah and his messenger]

Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction." -Pascal


While islam is barbaric and evil , in the wake of Congressman Tancredo's remarks I agree with Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald :

It would have been better to make the following point: during the Cold War, the Soviet rulers knew that if they did certain things, certain things would be done by NATO or the American government. And the knowledge of what might be done, would be done, in return, helped prevent the Soviet rulers from doing what they might otherwise have done.

So it would be helpful to make suggestions as to what would constitute deterrence. These might include, not destroying Mecca, which would cause maddened Muslims everywhere to attack and kill Infidels -- and the problem with Islam is that it contains many elements of a violent cult that cannot be wished away, or hidden any longer. Is that something we wish to create? But more sober discussion of how, for example, points of entry and exit into Mecca, could systematically be reduced in number, or airfields used by pilgrims made unusable, is a different suggestion, one that need not be final.

It is now clear to Muslims in the West, or to some of them, that their assumption about continued Western appeasement, based on continued misunderstanding of Islam, was wrong. The EU's foreign policy is still in place, but Bat Ye'or's "Eurabia" is circulating -- even at the highest levels of the Pentagon. Eventually, the instrument of terror will awaken enough Infidels to the permanent problem of Muslims in their midst, who may be "moderate" or "immoderate," whose brand of "moderation" may be real, or feigned, permanent or temporary, immune or not immune to all the personal setbacks, including depressive fits, that a certain number of people in any population, Muslim or non-Muslim, may experience, but that in the case of Muslims, inexorably leads, given that the universe is viewed through the prism of Islam, to attacks on Infidels.

So by all means let there be discussion of deterrence. Such deterrrence could consist of a series of measures, steadily rising in significance.

These could include, but not be limited to:

1) Seizure of Saudi-owned assets in the West, and sale of such assets to pay for the economic damage, including the cost of surveillance and other security measures, that are attributable to Saudi-funded mosques, madrasas, and propaganda all over the world.

2) Seizure of other Arab-owned or Muslim-owned assets in the West, for the same reasons. There need not be any distinction made between property owned by governments and those who are deemed to be enemy nationals -- no such distinction was made during World War II.

3) A complete ban on Muslim migration to the Western world (which needs to be undertaken in any case), and limits put on any contact between Muslims living in the West, who may already have obtained ciizenship and -- unless they are native-born converts -- their countries of origin.

4) Government-sponsored centers to teach people about Islam outside of universities which have been captured in too many places by the apologists for Islam, both Muslim and non=-Muslim, or overnment fellowships for study at institutes set up, not necessarily by the government, to create a cadre of people well-versed in the tenets of Islam and the history of Jihad-conquest.

5) War-footing (i.e., Manhattan Project support for solar and wind and nuclear energy projects, for conservation, and for mass transit, including that such as Amtrak which may lose money, but should be cheerfully subsidized by a more intelligent policy.

6) An end to all outward and visible signs of phony "respect" for Islam, including the refusal to mention "Islmaic terrorism" or "Muslim terrorism." Use these adjectives. Use the word "jihad." Stop all attempts at verbal escamotage, where we are left with deliberate vagueness.

7) End all access to Western education, not only for those Arabs and Muslims studying any kind of science, but in all areas. Instead of attempting the hopeless project of "educating them" out of their belief-system, notice how many terrorists have taken advantage of Western education, and how many A. Q. Khans, or his epigones, have learned from their time in the West how to better damage that West.

8) End all access to the Western world for the children of the ruling elites all over the Muslim world. Without this escape hatch, those rulers will have to begin to consider how to ameliorate things in their own countries.

9) End the jizyah of Infidel aid to Muslim states, such as Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, and whatever the latest political instrument of the shock troops of the Jihad against Israel, the "Palestinians," may be called. Call attention to the $10 trillion that has already been recdeived by the Muslim members of OPEC in the last 1/3 century, and continue to advise those Pakistans, Egyptians, Jordanians and "Palestinians" to ask for that aid no longer from the Infidels, who suddenly have to pay higher prices for oil and hundreds of billions more for security all over the Western world, but to those Arab and Muslim states that, not coincidentally, are receiving those hundreds of billions more in oil revenues each year.

10) Keep the focus clearly on the belief-system of Islam and on Jihad. And after the next small terrorist attack on Infidels -- say, 10 killed - begin to legislate to make sure that some of the measures suggested above become not merely ideas but the law.

11) Clean out the taxpayer-funded government radio and television stations of those who have so misled us about Islam over the past 20-30 years. Begin, possibly, by firing John Simpson, the deeply, conspiratorially anti-Israel head of the BBC World Affairs broadcasting, the same John Simpson (a close friend of Peter Hounam, whose conspiracy book is the kind of thing that antisemites love to flog) who described the Muslim bombers in London as "misguided criminals." That should have been enough to cause his discharge. Why wasn't it? What will it take for the long-suffering British license-payers to demand a change in the BBC coverage and, to begin with, in the personnel in charge of reporting on the Middle East and Islam, where the Lord-Haw-Haw business has gotten way out of hand?

These are things that can be done, should be done, long before suggestions about "bombing Mecca" need to be bruited about.

Talk of attacking Mecca, instead of all of these other suggestions (which do include limiting easy access to Mecca, something which the Saudis already do in limiting the number of visitors), is not likely to be helpful.

free hit counter